Talk:List of pornographic performers by decade

This article was nominated for deletion on 11 April 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of pornographic performers by decade redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 12 months

Wikipedia is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Lists Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pornography High‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality Mid‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Kleeman, Jenny (26 May 2015). "The Wikipedia wars: does it matter if our biggest source of knowledge is written by men?". New Statesman.

(no title)

What happened to Trinity Loren? 2603:8001:CD40:3E06:9506:4ABF:7FE4:A62D (talk) 17:58, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Trinity Loren Wikipedia article was deleted in 2017 for lack of coverage by reliable sources. The list entry was removed shortly afterward. • Gene93k (talk) 21:00, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actors with Wikipedia articles in other languages

I see one editor, Gene93k has removed entries for actors who have Wikipedia articles in other languages (Removal #1 Removal #2). Is there an existing consensus against inclusion of actors with Wikipedia articles in other languages? Is there a policy against such an inclusion?
In the case of Removal #2, the actor has articles in 16 different languages, which, suggests some level of notability, given that there are 101 Wikipedias with policies on notability (with at least one lanaguage, the language that was linked, having such a policy).
While it makes sense to require a standard of notability for inclusion in the list, I see no reason to limit notability to the existence of an article on the English Wikipedia. I think we can rely on the notability policy of Wikipedias in other languages, and not just the English Wikipedia. The Mountain of Eden (talk) 20:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Mountain of Eden: The page is a list of notable (satisfying Wikipedia:Notability (people)) pornographic performers. Since the most recent dispute of BLP concerns, that notability for inclusion requires support for an existing properly-sourced en.Wikipedia article. Other editions of Wikipedia have their own standards for inclusion and sufficient sourcing. However, articles that exist on other language Wikipedia editions get deleted from en.Wikipedia as not notable all the time. • Gene93k (talk) 09:04, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As for the removals in question: 1. es:Kaylynn - won an award but the sources are self-published and unacceptable. 2. fr:Brandy Talore - the sources are just as bad, and the es.Wikipedia and de.Wikipedia pages rely on promotional sources, also unacceptable. English Wikipedia has cracked down over the past 15 years on stuff that is still tolerated on other editions. Presence over there does not make it notable for inclusion here. • Gene93k (talk) 09:04, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]