GA icon symbolizing Good topic candidates on Wikipedia.
List of Doctor Who episodes (2005–present) is the main article of the "Doctor Who (2005–present)" series, a current good topic candidate. A good topic should exemplify Wikipedia's very best work, and is therefore expected to meet several criteria. Please feel free to leave comments.
Q: Why are early series called seasons? In British English we have TV series.
A: Most sites, such as BBC's Classic Episode Guide and A Brief History, as well as most Doctor Who reference books, use the term "season" for the classic "series". There's a longer discussion here. This has links to the previous discussions.
This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who
This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
@OlifanofmrTennant, @Pokelego999, @TheDoctorWho, @Alex 21, apologies for the ping, but does anyone know an alternative source for the appreciation index from 2022-present- as DWN's reliability seems to be the only thing standing between this list and being an FL. Or any alternative ideas to deal with this-maybe I should hide the AI when transcluding? DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 16:14, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the ping. There's definitely been a mess introduced with all of these unnecessary noinclude tags, given the apparent removal of valid information in this article and the now-faulty column widths between tables for 2022–present (these widths no longer add to 100%). Doctor Who News is a valid inclusion unless/until there is an alternate source provided. -- Alex_21TALK22:07, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They look fine on all the screens I have seen it on- so I have no idea if there is any issues with the look of the tables. I'm borderline on it, so I didn't pushback too much on it's removal from featured content. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 07:15, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
THey look fine, yes, but the widths of all visible columns adds to 94% in a 100%-wide table, an incorrect setup of HTML and CSS. Something looking fine does not mean that it is. -- Alex_21TALK20:14, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe DWM has something? But I don't know if they record Audience Appreciation. If this information cannot be located or sourced, I'd just keep the column blank or remove it. While DWN's info is likely accurate, for all we know the info could be faulty and we'd never know because they lack a source. DWN is not reliable unless they have a source backing them up, in which case we should use their source. Magneton Considerer:Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 04:43, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
